only one topic falls and fall prevention pain management in

FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay

COMPETENCIES


724.8.5 : Foundations of Inquiry

The graduate differentiates between quality improvement processes, evidence based practice, and research.

724.8.6 : Literature Review and Analysis

The graduate demonstrates knowledge of the process and outcomes of conducting a literature review.

724.8.7 : Ethics and Research

The graduate demonstrates understanding of the ethics of nursing research, particularly human subjects’ protections, informed consent, and alignment with patient and family values and preferences.

724.8.8 : Patient Outcomes

The graduate discriminates between identified standards and practices that do not provide improvements in patient outcomes utilizing relevant sources of evidence and the application of nursing theory.

724.8.9 : Data Collection, Analysis, and Dissemination

The graduate describes the process of data collection, analysis, and implementation of evidence that can improve clinical practice from an interprofessional perspective.

INTRODUCTION


There are many sources of information available on the web and in journals relating to the nursing discipline. Therefore, it is of pivotal importance to understand the basic tenets of critical appraisal of research for its use in interprofessional healthcare practices. The aim of evidence-based practice (EBP) is to employ a three-pronged approach, blending the best available research evidence, patient values and preferences, and clinical expertise.

In this task, you will critique two primary research evidence sources. You will select one quantitative and one qualitative peer-reviewed journal article on a healthcare topic of interest.

REQUIREMENTS


Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.

Note: Research evidence must not be more than five years old.

Note: Upload a copy of the full text of the articles with your submission.

Note: You may use the same topic and research articles on both Task 1: Analyzing Research Articles and Task 2: Evidence-Based Practice Change.

A. Evaluate a primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:

Note: You may select an article focusing on a healthcare topic of your choice or an article focusing on one of the following topics: falls and fall prevention, pain management in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, or hand hygiene and infections in hospitals.

1. Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the selected journal article:

  • background or introduction (e.g., the purpose of the study)
  • review of the literature (e.g., research used to support the study)
  • data analysis (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data)
  • methodology (e.g., research type and sling methods)

2. Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas of the journal article from part A1 supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.

3. Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using specific information from the journal article from part A.

4. Describe one strength and one limitation of the study.

5. Describe how the evidence from the article in part A informs current nursing practices.

B. Evaluate a primary, qualitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications by doing the following:

Note: You may select an article focusing on a healthcare topic of your choice or an article focusing on one of the following topics: falls and fall prevention, pain management in children, opioid abuse, hepatitis C, catheter associated urinary tract infections, or hand hygiene and infections in hospitals. You may use the same topic that was used in part A.

1. Describe how the researcher addresses the following four areas in the selected journal article:

  • background or introduction (e.g., the purpose of the study)
  • review of the literature (e.g., research used to support the study)
  • data analysis (e.g., how the researcher analyzed the data)
  • methodology (e.g., research type and sling methods)

2. Evaluate whether the evidence presented in each of the four areas of the journal article from part B1 supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.

3. Explain how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher, using specific information from the journal article from part B.

4. Identify one strength and one limitation of the study.

5. Describe how the evidence from the article in part B informs current nursing practices.

C. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

RUBRIC


A1:A1. QUANTITATIVE: ARTICLE AREAS

NOT EVIDENT

An article is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

Does not identify a primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications. The description does not address all of the given points, or the description of any point is not supported by the article.

COMPETENT

Identifies a primary, quantitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications. Evaluates the article by doing the following: The description addresses all 4 of the given points, and the description of each point is supported by the article.

A2:QUANTITATIVE: CRITIQUE OF EVIDENCE

NOT EVIDENT

An evaluation of evidence is not provided for each area of the journal article from part A1.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The evaluation of evidence presented for any area of the journal article from part A1 does not logically show whether that section’s evidence supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.

COMPETENT

The evaluation of evidence presented for each area of the journal article from part A1 logically shows whether that section’s evidence supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.

A3:QUANTITATIVE: PROTECTION AND CONSIDERATIONS

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation does not use specific information from the journal article from part A to show how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher.

COMPETENT

The explanation uses specific information from the journal article from part A to show how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher.

A4:QUANTITATIVE: STRENGTH AND LIMITATION

NOT EVIDENT

A submission is not provided, or the submission does not identify 1 strength or 1 limitation of the study.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission is missing relevant information about the 1 identified strength or the 1 identified limitation of the study.

COMPETENT

The submission provides relevant information about the 1 identified strength and the 1 identified limitation of the study.

A5:QUANTITATIVE: EVIDENCE APPLICATION

NOT EVIDENT

A submission is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission does not describe how the evidence from the article in part A informs current nursing practices. Or the description is not supported with specific exles of currently used nursing practices.

COMPETENT

The submission accurately describes how the evidence from the article in part A informs current nursing practices. The description is supported with specific exles of currently used nursing practices.

B1:QUALITATIVE: ARTICLE AREAS

NOT EVIDENT

An article is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

Does not identify a primary, qualitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications. The description does not address all of the given points, or the description of any point is not supported by the article.

COMPETENT

Identifies a primary, qualitative research, peer-reviewed journal article (suggested length of 3–5 pages) that has healthcare implications. Evaluates the article by doing the following: The description addresses all 4 of the given points, and the description of each point is supported by the article.

B2:QUALITATIVE: CRITIQUE OF EVIDENCE

NOT EVIDENT

An evaluation of evidence is not provided for each area of the journal article from part B1.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The evaluation of evidence presented for any area of the journal article from part B1 does not logically show whether that section’s evidence supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.

COMPETENT

The evaluation of evidence presented for each area of the journal article from part B1 logically shows whether that section’s evidence supports the outcome of the study and implications for future research.

B3:QUALITATIVE: PROTECTION AND CONSIDERATIONS

NOT EVIDENT

An explanation of how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The explanation does not use specific information from the journal article from part B to show how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher.

COMPETENT

The explanation uses specific information from the journal article from part B to show how the protection of human subjects and cultural considerations were addressed by the researcher.

B4:QUALITATIVE: STRENGTH AND LIMITATION

NOT EVIDENT

A submission is not provided, or the submission does not identify 1 strength or 1 limitation of the study.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission is missing relevant information about the 1 identified strength or the 1 identified limitation of the study.

COMPETENT

The submission provides relevant information about the 1 identified strength and the 1 identified limitation of the study.

B5:QUALITATIVE: EVIDENCE APPLICATION

NOT EVIDENT

A submission is not provided.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission does not describe how the evidence from the article in part B informs current nursing practices. Or the description is not supported with specific exles of currently used nursing practices.

COMPETENT

The submission describes how the evidence from the article in part B informs current nursing practices. The description is supported with specific exles of currently used nursing practices.

C.:APA SOURCES

NOT EVIDENT

The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style.

COMPETENT

The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style.

D.:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION

NOT EVIDENT

Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.

APPROACHING COMPETENCE

Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.

COMPETENT

Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

 

“CUSTOM PAPER”
Order from Academic Writers Bay
Best Custom Essay Writing Services

QUALITY: ORIGINAL PAPER NO PLAGIARISM - CUSTOM PAPER

Why Choose Us?

  • non-plagiarized Papers
  • 24/7 /365 Service Available
  • Affordable Prices
  • Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
  • Will complete your papers in 6 hours
  • On-time Delivery
  • Money-back and Privacy guarantees
  • Unlimited Amendments upon request
  • Satisfaction guarantee
SATISFACTION
SATISFACTION

How It Works

  • Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
  • Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • Click “CREATE ACCOUNT ; SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

About AcademicWritersBay.com

AcademicWritersBay.comnbsp;is an easy-to-use and reliable service that is ready to assist you with your papers 24/7/ 365days a year. 99% of our customers are happy with their papers. Our team is efficient and will always tackle your essay needs comprehensively assuring you of excellent results. Feel free to ask them anything concerning your essay demands or Order.

AcademicWritersBay.com is a private company that offers academic support and assistance to students at all levels. Our mission is to provide proficient andnbsp;high quality academic servicesnbsp;to our highly esteemed clients. AcademicWritersBay.com is equipped with competent andnbsp;proficient writersnbsp;to tackle all types of your academic needs, and provide you with excellent results. Most of our writers are holders ofnbsp;master's degreesnbsp;ornbsp;PhDs, which is an surety of excellent results to our clients. We provide assistance to students all over the world.
We provide high quality term papers, research papers, essays, proposals, theses and many others. Atnbsp;AcademicWritersBay.com, you can be sure ofnbsp;excellent gradesnbsp;in your assignments and final exams.

NO PLAGIARISM
NO PLAGIARISM
error: Content is protected !!